Let’s start here:

For the past few weeks we’ve been discussing the siloed worlds we’ve created for ourselves based on our consumption habits and time-shifting behaviors. The concept of Soloculture is the result of our personal preferences becoming married to algorithmic decision-making, a partnership that has changed the way we live, in sickness and in health. We’ve noted the symbiotic nature of Soloculture, subcultures, and monoculture and how they continually feed off each other, the traditions and horizons pulsing in and out of favor at increasing speeds that have people feeling more disconnected from each other and time than ever before.

Sometimes, however, the stars align, and a piece of culture finds a way to feel relevant at all three depths: mono, sub, and solo. This is the holy grail for anyone looking to reap the benefits of a cultural transmission, whether it be a political party, a brand, or a movie studio. Today, as part 3 of our series, we’re going to take a few minutes to examine something that brings people out of their Solocultures and builds the connective tissue people are missing.

If there’s one area that can still claim the sort of impact we’re talking about, it’s sports. As you no doubt already know, the Super Bowl is the most watched event in America. This year’s edition of the game is carrying alongside it a perfect cultural storm: Taylor Swift, the upcoming election, continued uneasiness in advertising, the hollowing out of traditional media, just to name a few. Sunday’s game is not just the culmination of the football season, it’s the coronation of a sport that has to many become an all-consuming cultural behemoth. 92 of the top 100 broadcasts in 2023 were NFL games (and 4 of the other 8 were football-related), but the power goes beyond that. As Politico wrote in 2022, despite its myriad controversies (or maybe even a little because of them), “Pro football is the only thing that’s still big enough to make us feel small.”

How big does something have to be to be a monoculture? It’s a question I’ve been asking myself a lot lately. Is it actually quantifiable, or do you just know? The Super Bowl as an event certainly feels monocultural - last year it was viewed by an estimated 115 million people. But is the NFL as a whole truly the behemoth it seems, or are we confirming the bias of our own Solocultural experiences? According to GlobalWebIndex (GWI), in Q4 of 2023, 46.7% of Americans said they watch the NFL. That’s up 5% from Q4 of 2021, an impressive leap in 24 months, but it’s still less than half of Americans. To put it in perspective, 46.7% is roughly the same amount of Americans who say they are interested in travel (48.1%) or that they fear gun violence (46.8%). If you look generationally, the monocultural status of football becomes even harder to find. 33.4% of Gen Z say they watch the NFL, but a study by Polygon recently found that 42% of Gen Z watch anime weekly. Does that mean anime is a monoculture of Gen Z more than football is? Can it even be called monoculture if it only applies to one generation? Is monoculture actually more of a vibes-based sensation? And if so, whose vibes are we basing it on? Once you start digging, the questions write themselves, and our Solocultures seep in.

We’re going to avoid that runaway train of thought for now, because regardless of how we define what monoculture is today, it’s hard to argue against the fact that the NFL’s place in culture is outsized compared to most, if not all, cultural transmissions. To better understand how football - and sports at large - are seemingly the only thing connecting more than dividing in America right now, Quick Study spoke to professionals in various parts of the sports world. Based on our research and conversations, we found four key components that make sports stand out: timeliness, access, personalization, and community

These traits work together like a strong defense to attack culture from all angles at a scale and consistency that isn’t seen anywhere else. To extend the metaphor, they are the cultural Legion of Boom. Swipe below to learn more about all four:

It’s easy to see…

…through these conversations, how our Solocultural interests can become symbiotic with sports. Maybe we like the fashion sense of a particular WNBA player, or fell into a love of the Premier League because we have a habit of waking up early on the weekends. Sports are wide and deep enough to satiate our particular attachments while simultaneously making us feel part of something more. We trust its consistency to be there so that we can tune it in or out as needed. As the rest of culture flattens or even repeats itself over and over again, sports carry the weight of tradition with the foresight to evolve.

In this context, the biggest danger to the dominance of sports in culture is if they start to feel too much like everything else we consume. “If the wrong people are making culture decisions at any league, it could feel a little bit too try-hard and cringe and turn people off,” said Kayla. To her point, the big bucket of entertainment can draw people in, but it can also minimize the sport aspect of the story. What happens when clicks become more important than on-field performance? “Do the results matter to the casual fan? Not likely, no. They're having a fun time whether they're there physically or watching at home,” said Nate. “I don't know if [results are] as critical or important as they once were,” Paul said. “There's other ways to build influence and audiences now. But I think we still, as a culture, have an obsession for champions and MVPs.”

We’ll see a new champion crowned on the field on Sunday night, and an MVP of the game as well. But perhaps the biggest winner will continue to be any sport that can use its advantageous narratives to connect with us at any cultural depth. Soloculture hasn’t hollowed out sport or fragmented it; instead, it’s deepened the power of sport and broadened its appeal. There’s no wonder that brands are lining up to get a cut of the last monoculture in America.

Next time: Our final part of the Soloculture story. What does Soloculture mean for brands and marketers? Where are the opportunities for brands to make an impact on how people see the world? Also, more on what brands can learn from the power of sport in culture.


Global CEOs are saying Quick Study “moves at light speed without compromising on research and quality” and that we are “the real deal—the kind of team you want in your corner for all the big, gnarly, complex ‘how are we ever going to solve this?’ problems.” If your brand needs some smart problem solving, commission Quick Study to make a Study Guide for you.

Send us an email & we’ll custom design a plan that gets you the answers you need: hello@quick.study